Abstract

This study evaluated the feasibility of using classroom assistants as tutors of 1st-grade struggling readers in a school with limited financial and personnel resources. The tutoring program, Partners-in-Reading (PIR), offered assistance to 54 first graders in 2 cohorts. Classroom assistants scheduled tutoring a minimum of 4 times per week for 30 to 40 min per session: A typical session included the reading and rereading of familiar texts, an introduction of texts at or slightly above a student's instructional level, and various word recognition activities. PIR students' word recognition and development spelling scores were compared with Reading-Recovery (RR) students (n = 62) and a control group (n = 58). Although equivalent at the year's start, PIR and RR students outperformed controls on these measures at the end of 1st grade. They also scored higher than did the controls on a norm-referenced word recognition subtest and were less likely to be retained. PIR students also outperformed the controls on a norm-referenced comprehension subtest. This discussion focuses on the benefits of using classroom assistants as tutors and the related questions of when tutoring should be offered, its duration, and its evaluation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call