Abstract

SummaryBackgroundSecondary distribution of HIV self-testing (HIVST) kits by patients attending clinic services to their partners could improve the rate of HIV diagnosis. We aimed to investigate whether secondary administration of HIVST kits, with or without an additional financial incentive, via women receiving antenatal care (ANC) or via people newly diagnosed with HIV (ie, index patients) could improve the proportion of male partners tested or the number of people newly diagnosed with HIV.MethodsWe did a three-arm, open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial of 27 health centres (clusters), eligible if they were a government primary health centre providing ANC, HIV testing, and ART services, across four districts of Malawi. We recruited women (aged ≥18 years) attending their first ANC visit and whose male partner was available, not already taking ART, and not already tested for HIV during this pregnancy (ANC cohort), and people (aged ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed HIV during routine clinic HIV testing who had at least one sexual contact not already known to be HIV-positive (index cohort). Centres were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using a public selection of computer-generated random allocations, to enhanced standard of care (including an invitation for partners to attend HIV testing services), HIVST only, or HIVST plus a US$10 financial incentive for retesting. The primary outcome for the ANC cohort was the proportion of male partners reportedly tested, as ascertained by interview with women in this cohort at day 28. The primary outcome for the index cohort was the geometric mean number of new HIV-positive people identified per facility within 28 days of enrolment, as measured by observed HIV test results. Cluster-level summaries compared intervention with standard of care by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03705611.FindingsBetween Sept 8, 2018, and May 2, 2019, nine clusters were assigned to each trial arm, resulting in 4544 eligible women in the ANC cohort (1447 [31·8%] in the standard care group, 1465 [32·2%] in the HIVST only group, and 1632 [35·9%] in HIVST plus financial incentive group) and 708 eligible patients in the index cohort (234 [33·1%] in the standard care group, 169 [23·9%] in the HIVST only group, and 305 [42·9%] in the HIVST plus financial incentive group). 4461 (98·2%) of 4544 eligible women in the ANC cohort and 645 (91·1%) of 708 eligible patients in the index cohort were recruited, of whom 3378 (75·7%) in the ANC cohort and 439 (68·1%) in the index cohort were interviewed after 28 days. In the ANC cohort, the mean proportion of reported partner testing per cluster was 35·0% (SD 10·0) in the standard care group, 73·0% in HIVST only group (13·1, adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1·71, 95% CI 1·48–1·98; p<0·0001), and 65·2% in the HIVST plus financial incentive group (11·6, adjusted RR 1·62, 1·45–1·81; p<0·0001). In the index cohort, the geometric mean number of new HIV-positive sexual partners per cluster was 1·35 (SD 1·62) for the standard care group, 1·91 (1·78) for the HIVST only group (incidence rate ratio adjusted for number eligible as an offset in the negative binomial model 1·65, 95% CI 0·49–5·55; p=0·3370), and 3·20 (3·81) for the HIVST plus financial incentive group (3·11, 0·99–9·77; p=0·0440). Four self-resolving, temporary marital separations occurred due to disagreement in couples regarding HIV self-test kits.InterpretationAlthough administration of HIVST kits in the ANC cohort, even when offered alongside a financial incentive, did not identify significantly more male patients with HIV than did standard care, out-of-clinic options for HIV testing appear more acceptable to many male partners of women with HIV, increasing test uptake. Viewed in the current context, this approach might allow continuation of services despite COVID-19-related lockdowns.FundingUnitaid, through the Self-Testing Africa Initiative.

Highlights

  • Testing plays a key role in control of infectious diseases, including HIV, and it is crucial for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention

  • Set in Malawi, we aimed to investigate whether secondary administration of HIV self-testing (HIVST) kits, in the presence or absence of an additional financial incentive, via women receiving antenatal care (ANC) could improve the proportion of male partners being tested

  • We aimed to investigate whether secondary administration of these test kits, with or without a financial incentive, via people who had been newly diagnosed with HIV could improve the number of people newly diagnosed with HIV

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Testing plays a key role in control of infectious diseases, including HIV, and it is crucial for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Men aged 30 years and older, adolescents, the most economically disadvantaged people, and key populations (eg, men who have sex with men, sex workers, etc) have a high risk of undiagnosed HIV, and they report facing substantial barriers to standard facilitybased HIV testing services.[1] HIV self-testing (HIVST) provides a convenient, intrinsically confidential, and often preferred testing approach that can bypass facility access barriers, such as high indirect and opportunity costs, worries about confidentiality or reliability of routine services, and anticipated stigma.[2] HIVST was fully endorsed by WHO as a recommended approach to providing HIV testing services in November, 2019, and it is promoted as an important tool for reaching HIV elimination targets in all global regions by international disease control initia­tives (eg, the US Agency for International Development–President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief).[1,3] HIVST provides an evidencebased option to maintain HIV testing services, despite disruption to routine service delivery from the COVID-19 pandemic.[1]. Index testing provides a high yield of newly diagnosed HIVpositive people globally;[9] this approach was only endorsed in 2016–19 by HIV programmes because of concerns around confidentiality, stigma, and the safety of index patients and their partners, as well as feasibility due to existing laws and policies, and limited resources to support providers with ongoing training, monitoring, and supervision

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call