Abstract
A study of seasonal mean temperature, precipitation, and wind speed has been performed for a set of 19 global climate model (GCM) driven high-resolution regional climate model (RCM) simulations forming a complete 5 × 4 GCM × RCM matrix with only one missing simulation. Differences between single simulations and between groups of simulations forced by a specific GCM or a specific RCM are identified. With the help of an analysis of variance (ANOVA) we split the ensemble variance into linear GCM and RCM contributions and cross terms for both mean climate and climate change for the end of the current century according to the RCP8.5 emission scenario. The results document that the choice of GCM generally has a larger influence on the climate change signal than the choice of RCM, having a significant influence for roughly twice as many points in the area for the fields investigated (temperature, precipitation and wind speed). It is also clear that the RCM influence is generally concentrated close to the eastern and northern boundaries and in mountainous areas, i.e., in areas where the added surface detail of e.g. orography, snow and ice seen by the RCM is expected to have considerable influence on the climate, and in areas where the air in general has spent the most time within the regional domain. The analysis results in estimates of areas where the specific identity of either GCM or RCM is formally significant, hence obtaining an indication about regions, seasons, and fields where linear superpositions of GCM and RCM effects are good approximations to an actual simulation for both the mean fields analysed and their changes. In cases where linear superposition works well, the frequently encountered sparse GCM–RCM matrices may be filled with emulated results, leading to the possibility of giving more fair relative weight between model simulations than simple averaging of existing simulations. An important result of the present study is that properties of the specific GCM–RCM combination are generally important for the mean climate, but negligible for climate change for the seasonal-mean surface fields investigated here.
Highlights
Future warming resulting from continued increase in greenhouse gas concentrations is foreseen to be stronger in Europe than the global average (IPCC 2018)
We will investigate the various contributions to the uncertainty related to choice of models, through an analysis of a set of transient simulations, where significance estimates involve the internal inter-annual variability of seasonal average fields. This will be done through a targeted analysis of variance (ANOVA) for an almost filled combination matrix of 5 global climate model (GCM) and 4 regional climate model (RCM), a total of 19 available model combinations, and for a present-day as well as a future 30-year period resulting in a 2 × 5 × 4 period-GCM–RCM matrix
The two-index combination terms are the GCM and RCM influence on climate change (SG and SR, respectively); GR is the deviation of an individual GCM–RCM combination from the expectation of mean climate from linearity, averaged over periods; specific period-GCM–RCM combination (SGR) is the corresponding term for climate change
Summary
Future warming resulting from continued increase in greenhouse gas concentrations is foreseen to be stronger in Europe than the global average (IPCC 2018). In the context of utilizing RCM information for climate services it is important to extract as valid and trustworthy information as possible for users This involves detailed analysis of model output to map model performance in the historic period and spread between projections of future climate conditions. We will investigate the various contributions to the uncertainty related to choice of models, through an analysis of a set of transient simulations, where significance estimates involve the internal inter-annual variability of seasonal average fields This will be done through a targeted ANOVA for an almost filled combination matrix of 5 GCMs and 4 RCMs, a total of 19 available model combinations, and for a present-day as well as a future 30-year period resulting in a 2 × 5 × 4 period-GCM–RCM matrix
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
