Abstract

Globalization theorists have long argued that the convergence of left-wing and right-wing governments' agendas has made alternation of power irrelevant from the economic perspective, particularly in emerging economies heavily dependent on foreign savings. So far, however, the difficulties involved in quantifying integration and the lack of reliable data has made empirical work on these regions mostly inconclusive. In this article, I argue that stock market responses to national elections provide a simple and rather effective measure of partisan convergence on economic outcomes, suitable to testing this claim. Results challenge convergence theories, pointing to a scenario of partial divergence, whereby markets respond to elections along partisan lines but their capacity to anticipate a government’s agenda during the campaign is limited, even when electoral results are predictable. Compared to developed democracies, I find that the magnitude of market responses to elections is still significantly larger in the emerging markets.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.