Abstract
Emissions from sugarcane burning are known to impact on the respiratory health of sugar estate workers and local populations. Despite this, there have been few studies on occupational and ambient exposures and risks from airborne particulate matter (PM) associated with field burning and ash re-suspension. From workplace monitoring on sugarcane estates in two different South American countries in 2010 and 2011, median concentrations of airborne PM10 (particulate matter nominally <10 μm in diameter) were found to be statistically much higher during pre-harvest sugarcane burning (1807 μg m−3) than during either sugarcane cutting after burning (∼123 μg m−3) or in the sugarcane processing factory (∼175 μg m−3). Median PM10 measurements in ambient scenarios, for example in the sugarcane fields before the burning or during 24 h measurements in neighboring villages (bordering the sugarcane plantation), were much lower, between 18 and 37 μg m−3. From the analysis of size-selective samples of airborne PM10, collected during sugarcane field burning, cutting and ambient periods, almost all (∼96 wt %) fell within the ‘respirable’ fraction (<4 μm aerodynamic diameter), with a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of 1.1 μm. Residual ash from field and bagasse burning, characterised using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with X-ray elemental analysis, was found to contain carbonaceous and silicate-dominated particles in the PM0.5 and PM0.5-2.5 size ranges and fibres from <10 to over 50 μm in length. Only a small proportion of the field burning ash (average 0.6 vol %) and bagasse ash (average 1.3 vol %) was in the respirable fraction. However, from grinding experiments, which simulate disaggregation as a result of disturbance during harvest or bagasse ash removal, the ash was fragile and easily broken down into thoracic particulate (<10 μm aerodynamic diameter) and, in some instances, created respirable-sized PM. From exposure calculations, the 8 h time weighted average (TWA) concentrations of PM10, during the different measurement scenarios, were found to be below occupational exposure limits (OELs; 5000 μg m−3 for respirable PM). Ambient PM10 exposure of residents surrounding the sugarcane plantations was found to be below the WHO air quality guideline (50 μg m−3 as a 24 h mean). The relative risk calculated for ‘all cause’ mortality from exposure of nearby residents to PM10 generated by sugarcane burning was found to be 3%. The concentrations of PM10 produced during the processing of sugarcane were high (up to 21.5 mg m−3), which is concerning given that re-suspended particles of ash in the fields and processing plant have been previously shown to contain potentially toxic cristobalite. PM produced during sugarcane burning, and during extended periods of local exposure to the smoke and re-suspended ash, therefore, should be considered as both a potential acute and chronic respiratory health hazard. This issue will become increasingly important with the forecasted rise in sugarcane production for biofuels.
Highlights
In the production of sugar and bioethanol from sugarcane, the burning of leaf and bagasse increases manual harvesting efficiency and aids in waste disposal
The highest recorded concentration of PM10 at any one collection point (1 min averaged intervals) was just over 21.5 mg mÀ3 at site Burn7. This pre-harvest burn in Brazil, like that at Burn6, was started at night when ambient temperatures were relatively low (~17e18 C), whereas the measurements taken in Ecuador (Burn1-Burn5) were conducted during daytime when temperatures were around 25e27 C (Table 1)
The average values for the PM10 concentrations pre-harvest burning in Ecuador were lower (1835 mg mÀ3), compared with those measured in Brazil (2791 mg mÀ3)
Summary
In the production of sugar and bioethanol from sugarcane, the burning of leaf (trash) and bagasse increases manual harvesting efficiency and aids in waste disposal. PM, which is the focus of the current study, is generally grouped into different size ranges based on the aerodynamic diameter of particles able to pass, with 50% efficiency, through a specific size-selective inlet head. Most PM10 can penetrate beyond the extra-thoracic regions (i.e. nasal and mouth cavity), into the bronchial region and so can be considered to represent the particles that would deposit in the thoracic region of the lung (ACGIH/ISO-CEN). The respirable samplers which collect !50% of the particles 4 mm, represent those particles which if inhaled, can penetrate deeper into the bronchiolar and alveolar unciliated regions of the lung (ACGIH, ISO-CEN, QUARG, 1996)
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.