Abstract
Steady-state, two- and three-dimensional, finite-difference ground-water-flow models coupled with particle tracking were evaluated to determine their effectiveness in delineating contributing areas of existing and hypothetical public-supply wells pumping from two different flow systems of Cape Cod, Mass. The flow systems represent the range of hydrogeologic complexity of flow systems of Cape Cod and are typical of shallow, highly permeable stratified-drift aquifers. The first flow system (the simple flow system) consists of a thin (up to 100 feet thick), single-layer aquifer with near-ideal boundary conditions and no large-capacity public-supply wells. The second flow system (the complex flow system) consists of a thick (approximately 250-500 feet), multilayered aquifer with nonideal boundary conditions (including streams, ponds, and spatial variability of recharge rates) from which 32 partially penetrating public-supply wells currently (1987) pump water. Analytical methods previously used to delineate contributing areas to wells of Cape Cod were found to be incapable of accounting for all of the hydrogeologic and well-design characteristics that affect the delineation of contributing areas, including spatial variability of recharge, aquifer heterogeneity, nonideal boundary conditions, and multiple, partially penetrating supply wells. Results of the investigation indicate that the choice of either a two- or a three-dimensional model for delineation of contributing areas depends largely on the complexity of the flow system tapped by the well. Contributing areas delineated for hypothetical wells in the simple flow system were not significantly different for the two- or three-dimensional models of the natural system at pumping rates greater than or equal to 0.25 million gallons per day. For this relatively thin, single-layer aquifer with near-ideal boundary conditions, the use of a three-dimensional model to delineate contributing areas of supply wells may not be warranted. Several of the contributing areas delineated by use of the three-dimensional model of the complex flow system and by use of the three-dimensional model of the simple flow system for hypothetical conditions, however, did not conform to simple ellipsoidal shapes that are typically delineated by use of two-dimensional analytical and numerical modeling techniques, included discontinuous areas of the water table, and did not surround the wells. Because two-dimensional areal models do not account for vertical flow, they cannot adequately represent many of the hydrogeologic and well-design characteristics that were shown to complicate the delineation of contributing areas in these systems, including the presence and continuity of discrete lenses of low hydraulic conductivity, ratios of horizontal to vertical hydraulic conductivity greater than the stratified-drift aquifers, shallow streams, partially penetrating supply wells, low (less than about 0.1 Mgal/d) pumping rates, and spatial variability of recharge rates. Under these conditions, accurate delineation of contributing areas may require the use of a three-dimensional model. Particle tracking helped identify the source of water to simulated wells. In the simple flow system, precipitation recharge was the only source of water to the wells.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.