Abstract
Our goal was to determine PBDE levels in Taiwanese household dust and to examine the particle-size distribution of PBDEs in dust samples. Nine paired samples of floor and electronic dust were gathered from nine individual houses. Each sample was sieved with 100 (< 0.149 mm) and 200 (< 0.074 mm) meshes to obtain three fractionated samples (> 0.149, 0.074–0.149, and < 0.074 mm). Each house had 8 samples taken from it, including a pair of overall dust samples and 3 pairs of fractionated samples. Thirty PBDEs (BDE-7, 15, 17, 28, 47, 49, 66, 71, 77, 85, 99, 100, 119, 126, 138, 139, 140, 153, 154, 156, 183, 184, 191, 196, 197, 203, 206, 207, 208, and 209) in 72 dust samples were analyzed by high resolution gas chromatograph/ high resolution mass spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS). The levels of Σ28PBDEs and PBDEs in electronic dust were not significantly higher than those in floor dust in the paired overall dust samples, or the three fractionated samples. In addition, the levels of Σ28PBDEs and PBDEs were not significantly different for these three particle-sizes of floor and electronic dust. Based on the results of the factor analysis, the patterns of the PBDE distributions in floor and electronic dust were also very similar. A significant correlation of Σ28PBDEs was shown in the paired samples of floor and electronic dust. For the three fractionated dust samples, we found that only the levels of PBDEs from di- to tetra- in floor dust were significantly correlated with those in electronic dust. This may be because the PBDE contaminants in floor and electronic dust might originate from the same exposure sources, particularly for lower brominated PBDE congeners. The toddlers (6−48 months) (median estimated PBDE daily intake from mean floor dust: 2.73 ng/kg b.w./day) possibly ingested more PBDEs in household dust compared to the adults (0.0414 ng/kg b.w./day) based on our results. Our sample size was too small to represent the level of PBDE contamination in house dust from southern Taiwan, and thus a larger scale study is encouraged. In conclusion, our findings suggest that it may be not necessary for household surveys of PBDEs to collect different meshes of dust.
Highlights
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are a class ofChao et al, Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 14: 1299–1309, 2014 neurodevelopment (Chao et al, 2011; Shy et al, 2011)
For the three fractionated dust samples, we found that only the levels of PBDEs from di- to tetra- in floor dust were significantly correlated with those in electronic dust
PBDEs have been recognized as significant persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the indoor environment, and various studies show that PBDE concentrations in indoor house dust are several fold higher than those in outdoor house dust (Huang et al, 2010; Yu et al, 2012)
Summary
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are a class ofChao et al, Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 14: 1299–1309, 2014 neurodevelopment (Chao et al, 2011; Shy et al, 2011). A Chinese study examined PBDEs in central air conditioner filters from a new office building, and found that human exposure to PBDEs through inhalation and ingestion of indoor dust in the new building was less than that in old ones (Ni et al, 2011). PBDEs are readily detected in samples of house dust and handwipes from American families with young children (Stapleton et al, 2012), and for both toddlers and infants the indoor environment can be a key exposure route, through dust ingestion due to hand-to-mouth behavior as well as inhalation, leading to the accumulation of PBDEs in their bodies (Jones-Otazo et al, 2005; Stapleton et al, 2008). To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to examine three fractionated concentrations of PBDEs in house dust, including both floor and electronic dust
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
