Abstract
Few studies investigated residential particle concentration levels with a full picture of aerosol particles from 10 nm to 10 µm size range with size-resolved information, and none was performed in central Europe in the long-term in multiple homes. To capture representative diurnal and seasonal patterns of exposure to particles, and investigate the driving factors to their variations, measurements were performed in 40 homes for around two weeks each in Leipzig and Berlin, Germany. These over 500 days’ measurements combined PM10 and PM2.5 mass concentrations, particle number concentration and size distribution (PNC and PNSD, 10–800 nm), CO2 concentration, and residential activities diary into a unique dataset. Natural ventilation was dominated, the mean ventilation rate calculated from CO2 measurements was 0.2 h–1 and 3.7 h–1 with closed and opened windows, respectively. The main findings of this study showed that, the residents in German homes were exposed to a significantly higher mass concentration of coarse particles than outdoors, thus indoor exposure to coarse particles cannot be described by outdoors. The median indoor PNC diurnal cycles were generally lower than outdoors (median I/O ratio 0.69). However, indoor exposure to particles was different in the cold and warm season. In the warm season, due to longer opening window periods, indoor sources’ contribution was weakened, which also resulted in the indoor PNC and PNSD being very similar to the outdoors. In the cold season, indoor sources caused strong peaks of indoor PNC that exceeded outdoors, along with the relatively low penetration factor - 0.5 for all size ranges, and indoor particle losses, which was particularly effective in reducing the ultrafine PNC, resulting in a different particle exposure load than outdoors. This study provides a detailed understanding of residential particle exposure in multiple homes, facilitating future studies to assess health effects in residential environments.
Highlights
Aerosol particles, or particulate matter, have attracted concerns for public health because of their association with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases (Pope III and Dockery, 2006; Brook et al, 2010)
The overall mean indoor and outdoor PM10 are 25 μg m–3 and 18 μg m–3, respectively, which is comparable to the mean concentrations in Birmingham reported by
A novel dataset including parallel indoor and outdoor PM10, PM2.5 and PNSD were collected in 40 homes in Leipzig and Berlin under real-use conditions, covering a wide variety of residential indoor environments – from 40 m2 single apartment to 220 m2 detached family house
Summary
Particulate matter, have attracted concerns for public health because of their association with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases (Pope III and Dockery, 2006; Brook et al, 2010). Particle mass concentrations such as PM10 and PM2.5 (particles < 10 μm and < 2.5 μm aerodynamic diameter, respectively) are often quantified (WHO, 2006). People are usually exposed to a mixture of particles originating from indoor sources (being related to cooking activities and combustion sources), and the outdoor aerosol Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 20: 576–589, 2020 and leaks in a building) (Chen and Zhao, 2011). The indoor particle concentration diurnal cycles and size distributions depend strongly on residents’ activity patterns. To understand the magnitude and mechanisms of particle exposure in residential homes, it is important to measure particle mass and number concentrations (PMC and PNC, respectively), and their size distributions (PNSD and PMSD, respectively), both indoors and outdoors
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.