Abstract
Abstract A one-dimensional model of baroclinic instability is used to reconcile two differing interpretations on why neutrally buoyant floats cross the Gulf Stream more readily at subthermocline depths. The study compares the location of the steering level, where the particle speed matches the speed of a propagating meander, to the location of the minimum in the meridional potential vorticity gradient The former locale is the expected site of a maxima in particle exchange, based on kinematic arguments, while the latter is the expected site based on potential vorticity dynamics. Model results show that the two levels are not coincident; in general, the steering level is deeper in the water column than the minimum in the potential vorticity gradient. Additionally, it is the steering level where the largest cross-stream particle exchange is expected to occur.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
