Abstract

Local food systems are increasingly being studied in response to the threats imposed on global agri-industrial food systems. Central to local food is the community who is imaging and implementing diverse and hyper-local food assets, which are making a significant, but largely unknown, contribution to food security, resiliency, and sustainability. It is important to align these assets with broader regional food policies, programs, and regulations. However, there are few mechanisms to engage stakeholders or share local information. One possible mechanism to learn about local food assets is volunteered geographic information (VGI); a phenomenon that blends crowdsourcing, citizen science, and online mapping. It is currently being studied for its ability to engage and gather information from diverse and under-represented groups. This policy-relevant research investigates how VGI can support greater engagement and knowledge sharing across diverse food stakeholders. To achieve this objective, the VGI system framework is established to study the processes that support the creation of VGI. Next, the new era of food mapping, dubbed Food Mapping 2.0, is investigated to understand the impact evolving mapping techniques have on the engagement of food stakeholders. Lastly, the VGI systems framework, which is embedded in participatory geographic information system and participatory action research methods, is applied to support participatory mapping of regional food assets in Durham Region. His research gathered contributions on over 200 food assets in Durham Region – an upper-tier municipality just east of Toronto consisting of eight lower-tier municipalities – effectively capturing the distributed intelligence of government, not-for-profit, and community stakeholders. The crowdsourced data include locations, descriptions, and media related to farms, markets, community gardens, foodscapes, and other innovative food assets. The community identified urban food assets as a central strength of the regional food system. Overall, this project enabled the creation of an open food assets dataset, further supporting the development of an online Food Assets map and a Crowdsourcing Urban Food Assets report, which are collective used to inform future food policy, regulation, and program development. Overall, this research revealed a uniquely local and community-driven perspective about food system assets within Durham, while serving as a prototype of the VGI systems framework.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Local and Regional Food SystemsFood systems are essential to everyday life, providing nourishment for a growing population

  • This paper presents an investigation into the creation of volunteered geographic information (VGI) from a systems perspective

  • VGI itself is understood as a crowdsourced geographic information product, while VGI systems enable the creation of VGI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Local and Regional Food SystemsFood systems are essential to everyday life, providing nourishment for a growing population. Haklay et al (2014) studied VGI use in government, providing the most comprehensive guide for VGI implementation to date They further noted that the process by which the data are collected—including organizational practices, regulatory issues (i.e., license conditions), and technical specifications—is more likely to impede the acceptance of VGI than the early concerns associated with quality, accuracy, and completeness of VGI. Challenges faced by the global food system are interrelated with problems associated with climate change, poverty, nutrition, social justice, economic security, and environmental sustainability (Francis, 2003) Given these interconnections, the United Nations’ Trade and Environmental Review emphasize that a fundamental transformation of agriculture that shifts from a conventional monoculture-­‐based agri-­‐industry to a mosaic approach for sustainable, regenerative local food systems is necessary (Hoffmann, 2013). A mosaicked approach to local food systems is multi-­‐faceted, creating space for a full range of actors to discuss problems, leverage resources, and contribute to solutions (Baker et al, 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call