Abstract
In the linear model of technology transfer the contact farmer (CF) is the primary link to farmers. This presupposes that the CF is selected based on a set of socio-economic categories. Recent criticisms of the performance of CFs are hinged on flaws in the selection process and advocate a participatory approach. This paper tested individual and group socio-metric nomination of potential contact farmers and compared the nominations with the CFs working in two extension circles. It was shown that only three (3) CFs out of eight (8) in the study appeared on both the individual and group nominations. It was recommended that EAs should have a rethink and rely more on the people both individually and in groups in nominating CFs because only farmers themselves know whom they interact and consult most frequently. [IJARD Vol.3 2002: 64-69]
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
