Abstract

Abstract In recent decades, a growing body of research has discussed and illustrated the so-called deliberative speak ‐ or how, despite representatives of the expert-political system agreeing with public participation in decision-making processes, in practice effective public participation barely occurs. To address this, new governing tools have recently been developed and implemented, such as participatory budgeting, particularly in societies in the Global North. We have also witnessed several profound sociopolitical and economic changes ‐ the post-political turn and localist agendas are all part and parcel of a new era of governance and political institutions that are being discussed increasingly by social scientists as questioning democracy. However, empirical analyses of if and how these changes are being appropriated ‐ reproduced and/or resisted ‐ in the everyday practices of expert-political systems and of citizens and what their consequences are for public participation have been neglected. To overcome that, this article will examine the discourses of citizens and representatives of expert-political systems about their participatory budgeting in three Portuguese municipalities.

Highlights

  • Research in the social sciences has been very prolific in the last decades in discussing and empirically examining public engagement in decision-making

  • We focus on a particular case study, paradigmatic of both the radical potential and, as we will illustrate, what might be related to a post-political institutionalisation of public participation, in a particular socio-geographical context: the participatory budgeting in Portugal

  • We sought to show through the discourse thematic analysis of interviews with citizens and representatives of the expert-political systems of three municipalities in Portugal, that participatory budgeting (PB), being an institutionalized participatory mechanism might be functioning, namely in Portugal, as a depoliticization instrument, which would explain the low civic adherence to this process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research in the social sciences has been very prolific in the last decades in discussing and empirically examining public engagement in decision-making. The third-way politics due to their technocratic perspective on democracy was already a political and governmental expression of the post political period namely due to a powerful localist agenda simulating a sharing of power with citizens through soft-paternalistic mechanisms – the Big Society project and and specially the participatory budgeting were paradigmatic of this new way of governance (Moir & Leyshon, 2013) While these changes have been happening in recent years, analyses of how citizens and institutional actors alike negotiate them in their everyday have been neglected, even if they have been abundant regarding the deliberative speak or the rhetoric of engagement (Hindmarsh & Matthews 2008; Entradas 2016; Cotton & Devine-Wright 2012; Barnett et al 2012; Castro & Batel 2008). For examining current discourses on public participation within participatory budgeting processes we have interviewed citizens and representatives of the expert-political systems of three municipalities in Portugal which conduct participatory budgeting

Context and Method1
Analyses
Conclusion and Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call