Abstract
Adrenalectomy is the first line of treatment in unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma. Whether adrenalectomy should be performed using a cortex-sparing technique (partial adrenalectomy) or total adrenalectomy remains debatable. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of partial adrenalectomy (PA) to total adrenalectomy (TA) by comparing perioperative and functional outcomes. A systematic search was performed across Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library database for RCTs and non-RCTs comparing PA and TA on unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma. The main outcomes analyzed were the perioperative and postoperative effectiveness. In addition, weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals of continuous and dichotomous variables are presented. Two RCTs and 5 non-RCTs trials, including 834 patients were identified and included in the meta-analysis. PA was associated with statistically significant shorter hospital stay (WMD - 0.51days, 95% CI - 0.87, - 0.14; p = 0.007), shorter operative time (WMD - 15.54min, 95% CI - 25.12, - 5.97; p = 0.001) and lower overall complications (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32, 0.85; p = 0.009) compared to TA. There was no statistical significance in postoperative effectiveness, including postoperative blood pressure, potassium, hypokalemia, ARR and renin between TA and PA. PA seems to have advantages over TA. The surgical outcomes were comparable in TA and PA. The hospital stay, operative time and overall complications may be reduced. When technically feasible, PA might be considered as a better treatment for unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.