Abstract

Due to a lack of internal barriers, many radiation oncologists believe whole tongue (WT) irradiation is warranted in the adjuvant setting for oral tongue cancer. Our institutional practice is to include the resection bed and flap with a 5-10 mm margin, attempting to spare unaffected oral tongue. We hypothesize that partial tongue (PT) irradiation, when feasible, results in decreased dose to surrounding normal structures without an increased risk of local recurrence (LR). Patients with a new diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue treated with adjuvant IMRT between 2010 and 2021 were collected from an IRB approved database. PT was defined as <80% of residual tongue in the clinical target volume (CTV). Recurrence was deemed local if in the tongue or floor of mouth, and in field if within the CTV or marginal if outside of CTV. Mean dose to mandible, pharyngeal constrictors, and oral cavity were evaluated. Comparisons between groups were made using parametric one-way ANOVA. Multivariable linear regression was used to predict mean radiation dose. Local control and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier. A total of 130 patients are included with median follow up 34.1 months (IQR 13.5-64.6). Radiation dose was 48-72 Gy in 24-36 fractions, most commonly 60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions (84.6%). All were treated to oral cavity, and neck irradiation included bilateral 96 (72%), unilateral 31 (24%), and none 3 (4%). PT sparing was feasible in 91 (70%) and 39 (30%) required WT. Primary tumor stage in PT included 20 pT1, 50 pT2, 17 pT3, and 4 pT4, and WT included 3 pT1, 8 pT2, 15 pT3, and 13 pT4. 3-year local control for PT and WT was 96% and 87%, respectively. LR occurred in 14 patients overall (10.8%), 6.6% (6) of patients treated with PT and 20.5% (8) treated with WT (p = 0.072). Of the LR for PT, stage was 2 pT1, 3 pT2, and 1 pT3, and all occurred within the radiation field. Of the LR for WT, stage was 1 each of pT1 and pT2, 2 pT3, and 4 pT4. Overall survival was 57%, regional and distant recurrence was each 17.7%. Dosimetric analysis for PT vs WT is described in Table 1, demonstrating lower mean dose when the primary tumor CTV is limited to PT. Unilateral neck irradiation also resulted in a lower mandible [-8.5 Gy (-11.2 - -5.8)], pharyngeal constrictor [-14.3 Gy (-18.1 - -10.5)], and oral cavity [-9.0 Gy (-13.0 - -5.0)] dose (all p<0.001). Limiting the primary tumor CTV to PT for adjuvant radiotherapy resulted in significant sparing of the mandible and pharyngeal constrictors, and a routinely lower oral cavity mean dose of ≥3.5 Gy. There was a low risk of LR when implementing PT, and all LR occurred in field. Given the increased sparing of normal structures, and low risk of LR outside of PT radiation field, sparing a portion of unaffected oral tongue should be considered.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call