Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the result of electrocauterization and curettage, which can be done with basic instruments. Patients with ingrown nail were randomized to 2 groups. In the first group, nail matrix was removed by curettage, and the second group, nail matrix was removed by electrocautery. A total of 61 patients were enrolled; 32 patients were operated by curettage, and 29 patients were operated by electrocautery. Wound infections, as early complication, were found in 15.6% (5/32) of the curettage group, 10.3% (3/29) of the electrocautery group patients each (P = .710). Nonrecurrence was observed in 93.8% (30/32) and 86.2% (25/29) of the curettage and electrocautery groups, respectively, (lower limit of 1-sided 90% confidence interval = -2.3% > -15% [noninferiority margin]). To remove nail matrix, the curettage is effective as well as the electrocauterization. Further study is required to determine the differences between the procedures.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
