Abstract
TT u ‘f m orm criteria for what is clinically sound is diEcult to attain, since conflicting opinions originate at the interface between form, shape, extension, materials, and human physiology. All of these factors are influenced by training, experience, skill, and personal prejudices. Nowhere in dentistry are conflicting opinions better demonstrated than in partial and full coverage restorations. This survey was undertaken to (1) determine the prevailing consensus as to whether partial or full coverage restorations conserve more tooth structure and provide better esthetics and retention, (2) determine Jhe ideal location, if any, for establishing gingival margins of, restorations, and (3) obtain information regarding the criteria used by different centers of dental education for determining clinical acceptability of a preparation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
