Abstract

In this paper, we propose a Partial MLE (PMLE) for a general spatial nonlinear probit model, i.e., SARAR(1,1) probit, defined through a SARAR(1,1) latent linear model. This model encompasses both the SAE(1) probit and the more interesting SAR(1) probit models, already considered in the literature. We provide a complete asymptotic analysis of our PMLE as well as appropriate definitions of the marginal effects. Moreover, we address the issue of the choice of the groups (couples, in our case) by proposing an algorithm based on a minimum KL divergence problem. Finite sample properties of the PMLE are studied through extensive Monte Carlo simulations. In particular, we consider both sparse and dense matrices for the true spatial model specifications, and cases of model misspecification given wrong assumed weighting matrices. In a real data example, we finally also compare our estimator with different MLE–based estimators and with the Bayesian approach.

Highlights

  • Estimation theory and inference for econometric models that deal with spatially–distributed data differ substantially from the usual techniques of standard statistics/econometrics; see Whittle (1954), Besag (1972), Besag (1974), Ord (1975), and Cliff and Ord (1981)

  • E–mail: annagloria.bille@unibz.it, web https://www.unibz.it/it/faculties/economics-management/academic-staff/person/38038-anna-gloria-bille page: Preprint submitted to case of cross–sectional dependence (Conley, 1999), the way by which spatial econometric models are typically specified and parametrized is convenient as long as we can exploit the information gathered about the observed values and on the locations of the endogenous random variables

  • It is not uncommon that real data suggest the presence of an autoregressive structure both in the errors and in the latent dependent variable, as we show in our application

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Estimation theory and inference for econometric models that deal with spatially–distributed data differ substantially from the usual techniques of standard statistics/econometrics; see Whittle (1954), Besag (1972), Besag (1974), Ord (1975), and Cliff and Ord (1981). E–mail: https://www.unibz.it/it/faculties/economics-management/academic-staff/person/38038-anna-gloria-bille page: Preprint submitted to case of cross–sectional dependence (Conley, 1999), the way by which spatial econometric models are typically specified and parametrized is convenient as long as we can exploit the information gathered about the observed values and on the locations of the endogenous random variables. Probabilistic choice theory and random utility models (RUM) have a long history in economics – see Manski (1981) – with, in particular, the important Nobel contribution by McFadden (2001). Modeling spatial discrete choice (and, in general, limited dependent) variables is becoming a challenging work in economics, see Wang et al (2013), Qu and Lee (2013), Qu and Lee (2012), Lambert et al (2010), Smirnov (2010), and Xu and Lee (2015). Spatial dependence adds further complexity in the estimation of parameters

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call