Partial migration: niche shift versus sexual maturation in fishes

Abstract

Many fish populations have both resident and migratory individuals. Migrants usually grow larger and have higher reproductive potential but lower survival than resident conspecifics. The ‘decision’ about migration versus residence probably depends on the individual growth rate, or a physiological process like metabolic rate which is correlated with growth rate. Fish usually mature as their somatic growth levels off, where energetic costs of maintenance approach energetic intake. After maturation, growth also stagnates because of resource allocation to reproduction. Instead of maturation, however, fish may move to an alternative feeding habitat and their fitness may thereby be increased. When doing so, maturity is usually delayed, either to the new asymptotic length, or sooner, if that gives higher expected fitness. Females often dominate among migrants and males among residents. The reason is probably that females maximize their fitness by growing larger, because their reproductive success generally increases exponentially with body size. Males, on the other hand, may maximize fitness by alternative life histories, e.g. fighting versus sneaking, as in many salmonid species where small residents are the sneakers and large migrants the fighters. Partial migration appears to be partly developmental, depending on environmental conditions, and partly genetic, inherited as a quantitative trait influenced by a number of genes.