Abstract

One of the common features of decision‐theoretic rough set models is that they rely on total background (available) knowledge in the sense that the knowledge covers the discourse universe. In the proposed framework the author gives up this requirement and allows that available knowledge about the discourse universe may be partial. It is shown by introducing optimistic, average and pessimistic partial membership functions that a decision‐theoretic rough set model can be based on a very general version of partial approximation spaces. Dierent membership functions may serve as a base of the semantics of a partial first‐order logic. The proposed logical system gives an exact possibility to introduce dierent semantic notions of logical consequence relations which can be used in order to make clear the consequences of our decisions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call