Abstract
PurposeThis article seeks to provide an insight into the work of an expert witness working in drug trials in Crown courts.Design/methodology/approachThe approach is a case study of a single expert witness, drawing on experiences over several years.FindingsThe evidence produced in court is subject to the personal limitations and organisational constraints of the experts involved. Prosecution often relies on unreliable and secretive sources. It is important to increase transparency and for a robust challenge to be made to some claims. Many experts are former police officers who are rarely objective or neutral, hence the need for independent experts from within the field.Research limitations/implicationsPersonal experience cannot always be generalised so limits the information presented in this case study.Practical implicationsThe role of expert witness is a career development opportunity for people working in the drugs and alcohol field.Social implicationsIt is important to understand the subjective way in which testimony and evidence is produced.Originality/valueThis paper gives a rare insight into a key aspect of the legal process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
