Part-time positions in Caseload Midwifery Group Practice: Impact on satisfaction and quality of care

Abstract

BackgroundCaseload continuity of care models of midwifery are associated with benefits for both mothers and babies. For midwifery staff, caseload models offer flexibility, supportive work partnerships, and one-to-one care with women. However, most caseload models require midwives to be employed 0.7 full-time equivalent or more. AimTo evaluate the satisfaction of women and staff with 0.5 full-time equivalent part-time caseload midwifery group practice care. MethodsA mixed-methods survey study was undertaken. Women, part-time and full-time caseload midwifery staff completed an online survey regarding their experiences. Descriptive statistics were calculated and thematic analysis of qualitative responses was undertaken. FindingsWomen were highly satisfied with the part-time model of care. They indicated a number of advantages including excellent support, flexibility, and responsiveness in receiving care from two primary midwives. Similarly, caseload team midwives were satisfied with the part-time model and valued the flexibility that it offers. Improved coverage of hours and being part of a workplace that promoted work-life balance were perceived as key advantages of having part-time staff in the caseload team. DiscussionThe part-time model facilitated continuity of care and was received positively by women. For staff, part-time roles enhanced work satisfaction and reduced burnout. Most staff encouraged greater expansion of part-time roles. Organisations may reduce midwife burnout and associated costs by implementing part-time roles to support work-life balance and staff satisfaction. ConclusionPart-time caseload midwifery models offered greater flexibility and work-life-balance for staff compared to full-time models and were well received by women.