Abstract
Two experiments measured reading times for sentences with prepositional phrases whose syntactic analyses were disambiguated by plausibility considerations (e.g., “The saleswoman tried to interest the man in the wallet during the storewide sale” vs. “The saleswoman tried to interest the man in his fifties during the storewide sale.”) Reading times immediately upon encountering the disambiguating information were faster when the prepositional phrase modified a verb than when it modified a noun, suggesting an initial preference for the former analysis. However, reading times later in the sentence were faster when the prepositional phrase was a syntactic argument rather than a syntactic adjunct of whatever word it modified, suggesting a final preference for arguments over adjuncts. The results were discussed in terms of their implications for theories of parsing that claim initial decisions are made on the basis of information about the part of speech of words together with phrase structure rules, and for theories of parsing that claim that the specific syntactic frames associated with individual lexical items guide parsing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.