Abstract
The past decade has brought a boom of online initiatives that monitor performance of parliaments – a practice commonly referred to as ‘parliamentary informatics’. A recent survey identified 191 organisations monitoring over 80 parliaments worldwide; many of these use digital tools to aggregate information and facilitate citizens’ involvement in parliamentary activity (Mandelbaum 2011). At the same time, little is actually known about who uses these platforms and whether they increase the quality of democracy. This paper aims to fill this gap by assessing parliamentary informatics projects in three European countries from the point of view of key democratic dimensions: equality, accountability, and political responsiveness. In particular, the paper shows that parliamentary informatics projects achieve mixed results in terms of democratic quality. Many of the traditionally underrepresented groups in politics have even more limited presence on these online platforms. The accountability - including access to user-friendly, close to real-time, and objective political information that help ordinary citizen to hold their representative accountable - turns out to be the strongpoint of this type of projects. However, users do not consider transparency of information to be enough. Many participants build up significant expectations about political effects of their engagement. Yet, their expectations are generally disappointed by lack of impact.
Highlights
This paper shows that parliamentary informatics projects achieve mixed results in terms of democratic quality
Parliamentary informatics manages to attract some people who are normally not engaged in politics
There is a risk that the majority of those who access parliamentary informatics platforms and express their opinions are well-educated, able men, habitually involved in politics in one way or another
Summary
The paper focuses on three parliamentary informatics projects: OpenParlamento (OP) in Italy, TheyWorkForYou (TWFY) in the UK and NosDéputés (ND) in France. These all offer information and statistics about parliamentary activities, and the possibility of discussing and annotating. JeDEM 4(2): 279-300, 2012 legislative acts online. The project survey data in this paper originate from the author’s surveys of OP and ND (2011), and from Tobias Escher’s survey of TWFY (Escher 2011).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.