Abstract

ABSTRACT This article investigates how the Norwegian Parliament has been treated in history textbooks between 1800 and 2000. It also includes coverage of the medieval assemblies known as ting. Writing national history was affected by the Union with Sweden 1814-1905. In the early nineteenth century, authors often omitted parliamentary history as it had involved conflict with the Swedish king Carl Johan (reigned 1818–44). Over time, the Norwegian Constitutional Assembly and Norwegian Parliament became important topics. In the 1890s, textbooks began presenting recent history from a nationalist point of view. This continued after independence had been achieved in 1905. As the scene of the most important struggles in society, parliament often dominated such narratives. During and after the Second World War, some textbooks included mild criticism of the constitution and parliament. The constitution had not allowed poorer people to vote and parliament had collaborated with the German occupants. Parliamentary history received declining emphasis between 1950 and 2000. This stemmed from more international history and social history being included in curricula. Democratization remained central when considering the nineteenth century, and in the 1990s religious and ethnic minorities began to be included in the narrative of how the constitution had emerged in 1814.

Highlights

  • This article investigates how the Norwegian Parliament has been treated in history textbooks between 1800 and 2000

  • Parliamentary history received declining emphasis between 1950 and 2000. This stemmed from more international history and social history being included in curricula

  • Democratization remained central when considering the nineteenth century, and in the 1990s religious and ethnic minorities began to be included in the narrative of how the constitution had emerged in 1814

Read more

Summary

REDVALDSEN

1860s to the 1880s parliament succeeded in implementing a modern system of representative democracy. An attempt to condense the entire history syllabus for the last three years of the comprehensive school into a single work by Harald Hansejordet was published in 1988 It dealt with the struggle over annual parliaments and the admission of government ministers to parliament on two pages, merely stating the effects when the matters were concluded (in 1869 and 1884 respectively).. It dealt with the struggle over annual parliaments and the admission of government ministers to parliament on two pages, merely stating the effects when the matters were concluded (in 1869 and 1884 respectively).98 This very brief treatment completely overturned high politics in favour of social history, a trend that was ongoing through the 1970s and 1980s and which received its stamp of approval in 1994.99 The remaining textbooks which will be examined are all from the new type of secondary school replacing the gymnasium, which followed different curricula than those obtaining in compulsory education. Even for the nineteenth century, when parliament was the scene of the most momentous decisions regarding the country, there was no coverage except for a page about the Liberal and peasant opposition of the 1870s led by Sverdrup.120 the emphasis on democracy has been strengthened in educational laws and the curricula in recent years, democracy is today conceived more as rights, norms and participation than in its original meaning of government by the people.121 This was even more clearly brought out in the 1994 curriculum for the now-separate civics.122 Knowledge about actual democracy forms just one component of democratic citizenship.123 This explains why parliamentary history is no longer seen as of prime importance

Conclusion
Notes on contributor
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call