Abstract
The results of a randomized United States study indicated that the Today contraceptive sponge was less effective than the diaphragm (1-year cumulative life-table rate of 17.4 versus 12.9 pregnancies per 100 women, p = 0.01). However, this overall comparison is misleading. Using univariate and multivariate analyses to account for the effects of user characteristics we found parity to be the most important single determinant of effectiveness for users of the sponge, but parity was unimportant as a risk factor for pregnancy among diaphragm users. For nulliparous women the sponge was as effective as a physician-prescribed barrier method (13.9 for sponge, 12.8 for diaphragm, p = 0.45); however, parous women using the sponge were twice as likely to become pregnant (28.3 for sponge, 13.4 for diaphragm, p = 0.001). The effect of parity among sponge users is consistent with the results of international studies of the contraceptive sponge.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
