Abstract

This article examines the building height limit debate in Melbourne, Australia, in the early twentieth century. At issue was whether the city should modernize according to beaux arts planning principles or adopt skyscraper urbanism, which would require raising the city’s building height limit. Skyscraper opponents looked to Paris as a model for growth; skyscraper advocates favored New York. The debate shows the importance of ideal cultural landscapes—Paris and New York—in the imagining and shaping of Melbourne throughout the twentieth century. It also highlights the multiple meanings and expressions of modernity and progress within city contexts.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.