Abstract

BackgroundChildren’s intentions should be respected. Parents are the key persons involved in decision-making related to their children. In Japan, the appropriate ages and standards for a child’s consent and assent, approval, and decision-making are not clearly defined, which makes the process of obtaining consent and assent for clinical research complex. The purpose of this paper is as follows: to understand the attitudes and motives of parents concerning children’s participation in medical research and the factors influencing their decision-making. We also sought to clarify who has the right to be involved in decisions regarding children’s participation in research.MethodsA semi-structured Internet survey on parents’ opinions and attitudes and preferences concerning medical research involvement was conducted. Children were divided into three age groups (6–10-year-olds, 11–14-year-olds, and 15–18-year-olds), with three illness severity categories. Possible correlations between the number of children, children’s ages, parents’ educational levels, and parents’ attitudes were examined.ResultsAmong the participants, 42.3% recognized the term “informed consent.” The proportion of participants who understood “informed consent” increased with educational level. Four out of five participants did not know, or had not heard of, the term “informed assent.” Furthermore, the percentage of those who understood the term “informed assent” increased with academic level. Participants generally believed in prioritizing parents’ opinions over children’s, and that parents and children would ideally reach a joint decision. Although many parents favored collaborative decision-making, they also wanted their own will reflected in the decision and felt they should receive important information before their children do. Decision-making was affected by the condition’s severity and prognosis. This indicates that most Japanese parents believe that their children have the right to know their disease name and treatment; nonetheless, they should be protected. Parents’ values and judgments regarding medical intervention involving their children varied.ConclusionsChildren’s ability to consent to treatment and research believed to be in their best interests should be assessed appropriately. They should be permitted to provide consent or assent, and their views should be respected. Involving children in decision-making fosters more open communication and transparency between medical professionals, parents, and children.

Highlights

  • “Informed consent” refers to the legal approval for medical intervention provided by a competent child, whereas “informed assent” implies agreement to intervention provided by a child who does not have the full capacity to consent, and it does not constitute legal approval [7,8,9,10]

  • Decision-making was affected by whether the condition was life-threatening, whether it could be fully treated, whether it may result in disability; these results indicate that most Japanese parents believe their children have the right to be informed about their disease and medical research; they should be subject to protection

  • Some Japanese parents tend to believe that they should be informed before their children

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Parents are the key persons involved in decision-making related to their children. The purpose of this paper is as follows: to understand the attitudes and motives of parents concerning children’s participation in medical research and the factors influencing their decision-making. We sought to clarify who has the right to be involved in decisions regarding children’s participation in research. The importance of respecting the will of children and young people has been noted [1,2,3,4]; the process of children’s informed consent and assent has not been fully clarified [5, 6]. In cases of informed assent, children receive explanations of the research that are appropriate for their level, and they give approval based on their degree of understanding. Due to the children’s lack of social experiences and cognitive ability, it is not always possible for them to understand the medical personnel and researchers’ explanations sufficiently [12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call