Abstract

Summary Background & aims It is unknown what feeding strategy to use to prevent weight loss in patients with chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal mucositis. When possible, enteral nutrition is preferred to parenteral nutrition because of negative side effects. In a mucositis rat model, we demonstrated disaccharide maldigestion and fat malabsorption but up to normal absorption of glucose and amino acids upon their continuous enteral administration. We now determined the effects of four different (par)enteral feeding strategies during mucositis on body weight and intestinal recovery. Methods From days 2 to 5 after injection with methotrexate (60 mg/kg), rats continued ad libitum enteral feeding with purified diet (AIN-93G, strategy 1), received continuous enteral feeding [force-feeding, normal daily amounts] with glucose and amino acids (Nutriflex ® , strategy 2) or with standard formula (Nutrini ® , strategy 3), or received continuous parenteral feeding with standard formula (NuTRIflex ® Lipid, strategy 4). Saline-treated controls continued ad libitum purified diet. Results From day 2 on, methotrexate-treated ad libitum-fed rats showed a reduced food intake and body weight ( P P Conclusion Continuous enteral feeding in normal daily amounts during mucositis is poorly tolerated in rats. Parenteral feeding prevents weight loss during mucositis while enteral feeding in limited amounts accelerates intestinal recovery.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.