Abstract
BackgroundDiagnosis of life threatening childhood illness or injury can lead to significant distress reactions in parents, with many experiencing clinically significant levels of post-traumatic stress symptoms. These symptoms can have long-term adverse impacts on parent mental health, family functioning, and the adjustment of the ill child. Independent studies have found such reactions in several different illness groups. However, very little research has systematically compared the prevalence, impact and trajectories over time of post-traumatic stress symptoms in parents across different childhood illness groups with an acute life threat. The current study seeks to map the course of post-traumatic stress reactions in parents of children with various life threatening illnesses over an 18 month period, and identify factors that predict successful adaptation in families.Method/DesignThe current study described is of a prospective, longitudinal design. The sample included parents of children admitted to four major hospital departments at the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, for a life threatening illness or injury. Eligible parents were those who were caregivers of children aged 0-to 18-years admitted to the Oncology, Cardiology, Neurology and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Parents were recruited acutely, and completed self-report questionnaires at four time-points: within the first 4 weeks (T1:); then at 4 months (T2); 7 months (T3); and 19 months (T4) after admission. Questionnaires assessed parent and child mental health and wellbeing, and a number of risk and reliance factors such child illness factors, parent demographic factors, and psychosocial factors.DiscussionThis study is one of the first to document the trajectory of post-traumatic stress responses in parents of very ill children, across illness groups. Given that it will also identify risk and resilience factors, and map the course of parent outcomes over an 18 monthperiod, it has the potential to inform novel strategies for intervention.
Highlights
Diagnosis of life threatening childhood illness or injury can lead to significant distress reactions in parents, with many experiencing clinically significant levels of post-traumatic stress symptoms
This study is one of the first to document the trajectory of post-traumatic stress responses in parents of very ill children, across illness groups
In a recent systematic review [15] we found that in the first 3 months postdiagnosis, rates of DSM-IV-defined Acute Stress Disorder (ASD) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) ranged from 24 % to 40 % and 15 % to 25 %, respectively
Summary
Despite evidence suggesting that rates of PTSD in parents decline over time, a significant proportion of parents continue to suffer clinically significant levels of distress in the long-term. A greater understanding of parent distress reactions and their impact will assist in the allocation of resources to address this problem, with those potential resources ranging from basic psychoeducation, to more involved psychological approaches (e.g. interventions based on cognitive behavioural therapy or acceptance and commitment therapy), to involvement with psychiatry. If similar distress responses and trajectories are identified across illness groups, this could inform a hospital-wide approach to managing the traumatic stress symptoms of parents, and in turn, facilitate the introduction of evidence-based, generalizable interventions, which are currently sparse. Authors’ contributions FM is coordinating the study, contributed to project design, and drafted and revised the paper. KB contributed to the design of the study, and drafted and revised the paper. AD is assisting with recruitment, the design of the study, and drafting and revising the paper.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.