Parent decisional regret regarding neonatal circumcision in an American outpatient pediatric urology clinic

Abstract

Requests for circumcision revision are common in our American pediatric urology clinic. As parents are the surrogate decision maker for their child, there are several influences that can impact a parent's decision for or against circumcision. We sought to assess parents' regret regarding their child's circumcision status and to correlate regret to factors that might have affected the original decision. From March 2023 to January 2024, we surveyed parents who brought their male child to our office for any reason, independent of circumcision status. The questionnaire was two-fold: a validated Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) (0-100 where higher scores=higher regret) and our questions regarding their decision-making process and outcome. Regret scores served as a function of each of the independent decision making and outcome variables. Overall, decisional regret scores from both uncircumcised and circumcised parent groups were positively skewed with a median 0, mean 22, and ranged from 0 to 75. For those circumcised (n=91), the median regret score was 0 (IQR 0-25). For those uncircumcised (n=28), median regret score was 0 (IQR 0-24). Overall, 55% of both groups reported no regret (DRS=0), 24% had low-mild regret (DRS 5-25), and 21% yielded moderate-strong regret (DRS 30-100). Parents who felt they made an informed decision or were counseled by any physician had lower regret scores. Parents who presented for issues related to their child's uncircumcised or circumcised penis (DRS score 37.5 and 25 respectively) had higher regret scores. We found that a large portion of parents expressed no regret regarding their decision to have or not have their child circumcised (55%). There also was no difference in median regret scores between parent groups. However, a significant portion of parents did express moderate-strong regret (21%) and several influential factors were correlated with regret scores. These factors included informed decision making, physician counseling, appearance satisfaction, and problems related to their child's circumcised or uncircumcised penis. These factors are supported by other literature using the DRS and population studies. The limitations of our study included the limited recruitment of participants and potential time dependent bias of responses. One in five parents of both circumcised and uncircumcised boys expressed moderate to strong regret regarding their decision about neonatal circumcision in our pediatric urology clinic. Our data suggests that ensuring parents have sufficient counseling prior to a decision regarding neonatal circumcision is important.