Abstract

The article presents the hypothesis that in the formation of judgements about a man’s biological fatherhood based on similarity of physical characteristics, people may take into consideration not only the similarity of father to child, but also of mother to child. The objective of the experiment was to conduct an initial investigation of that assumption. In the experiment, participants were presented with descriptions in which information was manipulated concerning the similarity of child to mother vs. to father vs. to neither of them. A total of 312 students of both sexes took participation in the experiment, having agreed to take part in a short psychological study immediately after classes were over. They were asked to read some short stories and to give their opinion as to whether the man described is the biological father of the child. It turned out that in conditions where the child’s appearance was dissimilar to both of the parents, the participants doubted the biological parenthood of the father. In conditions where the child was similar to the mother, the certainty of participants that the man was the biological father was as high as in conditions where the story indicated that the child was similar to him. The results thus suggest that information about a child’s similarity to its mother may, in some situations, be significant in the formulation of judgements on the biological fatherhood of a man.

Highlights

  • In accordance with the evolutionary psychology paradigm, individuals face decisions on how to maximize their reproductive success (Clutton-Brock, & Vincent, 1991; Apicella, & Marlowe, 2004, 2007)

  • Procedure The experiment was designed in accordance with the analysis of variance (ANOVA) 2 × 2 × 2 × 3

  • Initial analyses demonstrated that all continuous variables included in the model had a normal distribution, and it can be assumed that the variance in results of particular conditions are equal (Levene test for equality of variances: W = 1.993, p = .159 for the variable of likelihood that John is the child’s father, and W = 2.365, p = .125 for the expected judgement made by John of the likelihood that he was the biological father). The fulfilment of these assumptions led to the decision to analyse the results generated by the experiment using analysis of variance (ANOVA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In accordance with the evolutionary psychology paradigm, individuals face decisions on how to maximize their reproductive success (Clutton-Brock, & Vincent, 1991; Apicella, & Marlowe, 2004, 2007). Dolinska: Parent-Child Physical Resemblance as Cues of Man’s Paternity greater material and non-material resources they invest in that child (Apicella, & Marlowe, 2004, 2007; Platek, Burch, Panyavin, Wasserman, & Gallup 2002; Platek, Critton, Burch, Frederick, Myers, & Gallup, 2003). This perceived similarity need not concern only external appearance, and personality traits (Heijkoop, Dubas, & van Alken, 2009), interests, mannerisms and attitudes (Gallup, Ampel, Matteo, & O’Malley, 2016), and even body odour (Alvergne, Faurie, & Raymond, 2009). We can say that the use of information about similarity of a man to a child in formulating judgements about biological fatherhood is of a universal nature: it applies to fathers, family members, and “external” observers

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call