Paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement: improved long-term survival with aggressive surgery?

Abstract

Following mitral valve replacement, surgical closure of paravalvular leaks is usually advised in severely symptomatic patients and in those requiring blood transfusions for persisting haemolysis. However, the long-term prognosis of less symptomatic patients or those not needing blood transfusions is unknown. Between 1987 and 1997, we observed 96 patients with mitral paravalvular leakage. A paraprosthetic leak was diagnosed after a median time of 119 days (range: 1 day-23 years) after primary mitral valve replacement. During an average follow-up of 5 years (range: 1-23 years), 50/96 patients were referred for surgical closure. Compared with patients who received conservative treatment, those referred for surgery had a significantly lower mean preoperative haematocrit (P = 0.002) with a higher proportion of patients being in the NYHA class III/IV (P = 0.03). Age, gender, left ventricular function and number and size of leaks did not differ between the groups. The 30-day postoperative mortality for valve reoperation was 6% (3/50); during follow-up three further patients died, resulting in an overall mortality rate of 12%. In the group treated conservatively there was a mortality rate of 26% (12/46). Thus, the actuarial survival for patients referred for surgery was 98, 90 and 88% after 1, 5 and 10 years, compared with 90, 75 and 68% for patients treated conservatively (long-rank P = 0.03). In addition, there was a significant increase in mean haematocrit levels (P = 0.0001) and an improvement in NYHA class III/IV symptoms (P = 0.002), vertigo (P = 0.001) and fatigue (P = 0.001) after surgery. Following mitral valve replacement, a more aggressive surgical treatment is recommended for patients with paraprosthetic leaks. Surgery should be offered to less symptomatic patients, as well as those not requiring blood transfusion.