Parathyroid preservation in total endoscopic thyroid surgeries via the mammary areolas approach: Real-world data from a single center

Abstract

BackgroundPreserving parathyroid glands in situ is crucial to avoid surgical hypoparathyroidism, but it is also one of the greatest challenges during thyroid surgery. Magnified endoscopic imaging has been proposed as a way to improve parathyroid preservation. Methods2,603 consecutive patients who underwent thyroid surgery at the First People’s Hospital of Zunyi from January 2018 to July 2022 were screened. 1,355 patients were eligible, including 965 endoscopic and 390 open cases. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) loss levels and severe parathyroid injury rates were compared between endoscopic and open cases. Meanwhile, factors that contribute to parathyroid injuries were assessed, including surgical extent, tumor size, carbon nanoparticle guidance, and surgical proficiency. ResultsPTH loss levels were similar between endoscopic and open cases (P = 0.440). The incidence of severe parathyroid injuries was also comparable (7.8% for endoscopic vs. 6.9% for open, P = 0.592). The endoscopic group had higher rates of autologous parathyroid transplantation (39.5% vs. 24.4%, P = 0.000), while accidental parathyroidectomy rates were similar (11.4% vs. 10.8%, P = 0.739). Among patients who received the same extent of thyroid surgeries, no significant difference was found in PTH loss levels and severe parathyroid injury rates, except for a higher risk of severe parathyroid injuries in endoscopic bilateral thyroidectomy (18.52% vs. 11.52%, P = 0.033). ConclusionsDespite the magnified endoscopic imaging facilitating the identification of parathyroid tissues, endoscopic approaches are not superior to open ones for the in-situ preservation of parathyroid glands. For a bilateral thyroidectomy, open approaches are safer for parathyroid preservation.