Parathyroid hormone measurement in chronic kidney disease: Impact of inter-method variability on mineral bone disease assessment

Abstract

BackgroundParathyroid hormone (PTH) is measured routinely as part of Chronic Kidney Disease Bone and Mineral Disorders (CKD-MBD) assessment. Multiple PTH assays exist with known differences resulting in CKD-MBD guidelines recommending treatment based on assay-specific thresholds. The study objectives are to assess between manufacturer and within manufacturer variability of PTH assays and the impact of assay variability on the assessment of CKD-BMD using both vendor defined and empirically derived thresholds. MethodsData were collected from Ontario, Canada’s Proficiency Testing Program (24 challenge vials, 115–133 laboratories all using secondary generation PTH assays. Mean PTH and precision by the coefficient of analytical variation (CVa) were calculated. For each vial, whether the manufacturer’s mean value exceeded the vendor-defined and empirically-derived upper limit of normal (ULN) was recorded and the concordance between assays was determined. ResultsAcross all laboratories, the mean PTH range was 12.0 ± 3.9 pmol/L and the mean CVa was 30%. The percent of vials with a mean PTH exceeding manufacturer’s specific ULN varied substantially between manufacturers. Only 58% of vials had complete concordance as to whether mean PTH was above assay-specific ULNs. This increased to 83% using the empirically derived ULN. ConclusionsCKD-BMD assessment and management will depend on the PTH assay. The between-assay variability is reduced but not eliminated when empirically derived reference intervals are used. Improvements in PTH measurement are required in order to ensure consistent patient care.