Abstract

Alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs), discrete phenotypic variations evolved to maximize fitness, may entail different cost‐benefit trade‐offs. In large mammals, differences in costs associated with ARTs—including energy expenditure and parasite infection—are typically greatest during the breeding season. Nonetheless, physiological and behavioral differences between ARTs can manifest throughout the year, possibly involving costs that may contribute to maintain ARTs within populations. Using the number of nematode larvae per gram of feces (LPG) as a proxy, we explored the temporal changes in lung parasite infection in territorial and nonterritorial male chamois Rupicapra in the Gran Paradiso National Park (Italy), between 2011 and 2012. We aimed to identify which tactic‐specific physiological and behavioral features (including age, hormonal levels, inter‐ and intrasexual interactions, and space use) or climatic factors (temperature and precipitation) best explained yearly variation in parasite infection within and between ARTs. Generalized additive mixed models showed that the fecal larval counts of lung nematodes underwent strong temporal changes in both male types. Differences between ARTs (with higher LPG values in territorial than nonterritorial males) were greatest during the rut and—to a lesser extent—in spring, respectively, at the peak and at the onset of territoriality. The difference in LPG between tactics was largely explained by the greater levels of hormone metabolites in territorial males during the rut. The other variables did not contribute significantly to explain the different shedding of larvae within and between ARTs. Our analysis suggests that different values of LPG between territorial and nonterritorial males are largely a result of tactic‐specific differences in the secretion of hormone metabolites, but only during the rut. To clarify whether rut‐related parasitism contributes to the maintenance of ARTs, tactic‐specific life history trade‐offs, for example, between reproduction and parasite‐related mortality, must be investigated.

Highlights

  • Polygynous mating systems are often associated with the development of alternative male reproductive tactics (ARTs), polymorphic traits that occur within species or populations and are selected to maximize fitness (Taborsky, Oliveira, & Brockmann, 2008)

  • Using the number of nematode larvae per gram of feces (LPG) as a proxy, we explored the temporal changes in lung parasite infection in territorial and nonterritorial male chamois Rupicapra in the Gran Paradiso National Park (Italy), between 2011 and 2012

  • Our analysis suggests that different values of LPG between territorial and nonterritorial males are largely a result of tactic‐specific differences in the secretion of hormone metabolites, but only during the rut

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Polygynous mating systems are often associated with the development of alternative male reproductive tactics (ARTs), polymorphic traits that occur within species or populations and are selected to maximize fitness (Taborsky, Oliveira, & Brockmann, 2008). Over large part of the year, male types may express different physiological and behavioral features, such as different hormonal levels (Corlatti, Palme, & Lovari, 2014) and patterns of space use, with territorial males occupying smaller home ranges at lower elevations compared to nonterritorial males (Corlatti, Bassano, Valencak, & Lovari, 2013; von Hardenberg et al, 2000). We aimed to identify which physiological and behavioral features best explained the differences in proxies of lung parasite infection within and between tactics over the year To this end, we investigated how the modeled tactic‐specific temporal pattern of larval counts changed, after controlling for the effects of several internal and external variables—including age, hormonal levels, inter‐ and intrasexual interactions, space use, temperature, and precipitation. Their inclusion in the model should flatten the temporal changes within both male types, rather than reduce the difference between them

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call