Abstract
Phylogenetic niche conservatism implies that sister taxa will have similar niches, although the niches of disjunct subspecies may evolve differently. This study uses Macaca assamensis, subspecies assamensis and pelops, to investigate the similarities of realized climatic niches of two disjunct subspecies (separated by the Brahmaputra River) along with a similarity analysis of their respective regions’ climate. Modeled distributions were used to quantify their potential distribution under current and future climate scenarios. The climatic similarity between regions of each subspecies was tested with principal component analysis (PCA), and the realized climatic niche overlap between two subspecies was tested with a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) on a subset of the least correlated variables out of 24 publicly available topo‐bioclimatic variables. Tukey's honest significance difference (HSD) was used to test the range differences (on all 24 variables) between subspecies. The potential distribution of both taxa in the current climate and projected future climate was model‐predicted using MaxEnt and Random Forest. We found significantly different climatic ranges for 21 predictors (HSD; p < 0.05) for the two subspecies, significantly different climatic conditions for their regions (using PCA; p < 0.001), and significantly different realized climatic niches for the two subspecies (MANOVA; p < 0.001). The distribution models generated a larger potential area than the currently known distributions. Although literature show that the Brahmaputra River is an effective dispersal barrier, we found some of the neighboring geographic range for both subspecies appears to be potentially suitable for the other taxon. The projected future potential areas indicate that some parts of the currently occupied geography, mostly southern parts, may become climatically unsuitable, whereas other new geographical areas may become suitable. Most of these new potential areas will be toward the north where higher and fragmented mountains, which has conservation implications.
Highlights
Closely related sister species and subspecies are expected to show similarities in their niches (Losos, 2008; Peterson, 2011; Peterson, Soberón, & Sánchez-Cordero, 1999)
The principal dimensions of fundamental niches tend to overlap between closely related species and subspecies, as suggested by phylogenetic niche conservatism (Losos, 2008; Peterson et al, 1999)
Macaca assamensis has since been divided into two subspecies; M. assamensis ssp. pelops and M. assamensis ssp. assamensis
Summary
Closely related sister species and subspecies are expected to show similarities in their niches (Losos, 2008; Peterson, 2011; Peterson, Soberón, & Sánchez-Cordero, 1999). The eastern population became isolated from the western population (source) because of glacial retreat in a warm period during the late Pleistocene to Holocene, which transformed the glacier into a major river, creating the current barrier at the eastern end of the Himalayan mountain chain (Fooden, 1988; Khanal et al, 2018) This gives rise to the question: Do the subspecies have a high degree of similarity in their realized climatic niches, as explained by phylogenetic niche conservatism (Losos, 2008; Peterson et al, 1999), or do they have differently realized climatic niches because of climatic context from disjunct distributions since the last maximum glaciation This gives rise to the question: Do the subspecies have a high degree of similarity in their realized climatic niches, as explained by phylogenetic niche conservatism (Losos, 2008; Peterson et al, 1999), or do they have differently realized climatic niches because of climatic context from disjunct distributions since the last maximum glaciation (ca. 18,000 years ago)? To answer this question, here we set out to investigate (a) whether climatic conditions are similar between the respective regions of the two subspecies of M. assamensis, (b) whether quantified realized climatic niches are similar between the taxa, and (c) where the potential distributional areas under current and future climate scenarios are located?
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
