Abstract

Organophosphates were first synthesized in the 1930s as insecticides1 and were subsequently shown to have direct neurotoxic effects in mammals, as well. The neurotoxicity is derived from their ability to inhibit acetylcholinesterase by covalently modifying the active-site serine group in the enzyme. Mazur2 first demonstrated the presence of an organophosphate-hydrolyzing enzyme in mammalian tissue, an observation that ultimately led to the identification of a human paraoxonase in serum in 1953.3 Paraoxonase—so named because of its ability to hydrolyze the toxic metabolite of parathion, paraoxon—was also shown early after its identification to manifest arylesterase activity, an effect that was underappreciated until the enzyme was found to play a role in modulating vascular oxidant stress many years later. Article see p 147 The paraoxonase story is a good example of the power of language to mislead. There is no teleological reason for mammals to have evolved an enzyme that can hydrolyze synthetic organophosphates; yet, paraoxonase was isolated in an effort to understand the endogenous metabolism of these exogenous neurotoxins. The enzymatic activity for which the enzyme is named is screened by using synthetic substrates without regard for the native substrate or its role in human (patho)biology. This focus on one aspect of the enzyme’s function, overemphasized by its denotation, delayed an appreciation of other potential—and perhaps more relevant—roles. In 1991, Mackness et al4 showed that paraoxonase …

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call