Abstract
There is evidence that tone‐burst otoacoustic emissions (TBOAEs) might be useful for estimating loudness, but appropriate analysis parameters for loudness estimation must first be examined. The purpose of the present work was to collect TBOAE measurements and loudness estimates across a wide range of levels in the same listeners. Both measures were recorded for 1‐ and 4‐kHz stimuli and then analyzed using a wide range of parameters to determine which parameter set yielded lowest mean‐square‐error estimation of loudness with respect to a psychoacoustical, cross‐modality‐matching procedure and the inflected exponential (INEX) loudness model. The present results show strong agreement between 1‐kHz loudness estimates derived from TBOAEs and loudness estimated using cross‐modality matching, with TBOAE estimation accounting for a significant portion of the variance. Additionally, the results indicate that analysis parameters may vary within a reasonable range without compromising the results (i.e., the estimates exhibit some parametric robustness). The lack of adequate parametric optimization for TBOAEs at 4 kHz suggests that measurements at this frequency are strongly contaminated by the ear‐canal resonances, meaning that deriving loudness estimates from TBOAEs at this frequency is significantly more challenging than at 1 kHz. [Work supported by Capita Foundation.]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.