Abstract
Previous work has shown that it is possible to use a mechanical phase variable to accurately quantify the progression through a human gait cycle, even in the presence of disturbances. However, mechanical phase variables are highly dependent on the behavior of the body segment from which they are measured, which can change with the human's task or in response to different disturbances. In this study, we compare kinematic parameterization methods based on time, thigh phase angle, and tibia phase angle with motion capture data obtained from ten able-bodied subjects walking at three inclines while experiencing phase-shifting perturbations from a split-belt instrumented treadmill. The belt, direction, and timings of perturbations were quasi-randomly selected to prevent anticipatory action by the subjects and sample different types of perturbations. Statistical analysis revealed that both phase parameterization methods are superior to time parameterization, with thigh phase angle also being superior to tibia phase angle in most cases.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
