Abstract

Motivated by the role of triadic closures in social networks, and the importance of finding a maximum subgraph avoiding a fixed pattern, we introduce and initiate the parameterized study of the StrongF-closure problem, where F is a fixed graph. This is a generalization of Strong Triadic Closure, whereas it is a relaxation of F-free Edge Deletion. In StrongF-closure, we want to select a maximum number of edges of the input graph G, and mark them as strong edges, in the following way: whenever a subset of the strong edges forms a subgraph isomorphic to F, then the corresponding induced subgraph of G is not isomorphic to F. Hence, the subgraph of G defined by the strong edges is not necessarily F-free, but whenever it contains a copy of F, there are additional edges in G to forbid that strong copy of F in G. We study StrongF-closure from a parameterized perspective with various natural parameterizations. Our main focus is on the number k of strong edges as the parameter. We show that the problem is FPT with this parameterization for every fixed graph F, whereas it does not admit a polynomial kernel even when $$F =P_3$$. In fact, this latter case is equivalent to the Strong Triadic Closure problem, which motivates us to study this problem on input graphs belonging to well known graph classes. We show that Strong Triadic Closure does not admit a polynomial kernel even when the input graph is a split graph, whereas it admits a polynomial kernel when the input graph is planar, and even d-degenerate. Furthermore, on graphs of maximum degree at most 4, we show that Strong Triadic Closure is FPT with the above guarantee parameterization $$k - \mu (G)$$, where $$\mu (G)$$ is the maximum matching size of G. We conclude with some results on the parameterization of StrongF-closure by the number of edges of G that are not selected as strong.

Highlights

  • Graph modification problems are at the heart of parameterized algorithms

  • We show that Strong Triadic Closure does not admit a polynomial kernel even when the input graph is a split graph, whereas it admits a polynomial kernel when the input graph is planar, and even d-degenerate

  • We study the parameterized complexity of Strong F -closure with three different natural parameters: the number of strong edges, the number of strong edges above guarantee, and the number of weak edges

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Graph modification problems are at the heart of parameterized algorithms. In particular, the problem of deleting as few edges as possible from a graph so that the remaining graph satisfies a given property has been studied extensively from the viewpoint of both classical and parameterized complexity for the last four decades [23, 11, 8]. The parameterized complexity of F -free Edge Deletion has been studied extensively when parameterized by , the number of removed edges With this parameter, the problem is FPT if F is of constant size [4], whereas it becomes W[1]-hard when parameterized by the. Contrary to the parameterization by k + |V (F )|, we cannot hope for FPT results when the problem is parameterized by + |V (F )| This is because, when = 0, Strong F -closure is equivalent to asking whether G is F -free, which is equivalent to solving Induced Subgraph Isomorphism that is well known to be W[1]-hard [11, 15].

Preliminaries
Parameterized complexity of Strong F-closure
Parameterized complexity of Strong Triadic Closure
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call