Abstract

This paper conducts a parameter interval uncertainty analysis of the internal resonance of a rotating porous shaft–disk–blade assembly reinforced by graphene nanoplatelets (GPLs). The nanocomposite rotating assembly is considered to be composed of a porous metal matrix and graphene nanoplatelet (GPL) reinforcement material. Effective material properties are obtained by using the rule of mixture and the Halpin–Tsai micromechanical model. The modeling and internal resonance analysis of a rotating shaft–disk–blade assembly are carried out based on the finite element method. Moreover, based on the Chebyshev polynomial approximation method, the parameter interval uncertainty analysis of the rotating assembly is conducted. The effects of the uncertainties of the GPL length-to-width ratio, porosity coefficient and GPL length-to-thickness ratio are investigated in detail. The present analysis procedure can give an interval estimation of the vibration behavior of porous shaft–disk–blade rotors reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets (GPLs).

Highlights

  • Shaft–disk–blade assemblies are commonly applied in many rotor structures, such as gas turbines, aero-engines, and so on

  • Many scholars have focused on the vibration behaviors of shaft–disk–blade assemblies [1,2,3]

  • Twinkle et al [16] studied the vibrations of porous cylindrical panels reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets (GPLs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Shaft–disk–blade assemblies are commonly applied in many rotor structures, such as gas turbines, aero-engines, and so on. Twinkle et al [16] studied the vibrations of porous cylindrical panels reinforced with GPLs. Considering the effect of the elastic medium, Mohammad et al [17] investigated the nonlinear performance of a GPL-reinforced functionally graded (FG) conical panel. In which en and e1 are the mass density coefficients and porosity coefficients, respectively; and υ*(z), ρ*(z) and E*(z) are the Poisson’s ratio, mass density and Young’s modulus in the case of no pores, respectively. In which EM and EGPL are the Young’s modulus of the matrix and GPLs, respectively. Where W0 and λ are the characteristic value and weight fraction index of GPLs, respectively

Finite Element Implementation
Results and Discussions
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.