Abstract
Parameter estimation from observable or experimental data is a crucial stage in any modeling study. Identifiability refers to one’s ability to uniquely estimate the model parameters from the available data. Structural unidentifiability in dynamic models, the opposite of identifiability, is associated with the notion of degeneracy where multiple parameter sets produce the same pattern. Therefore, the inverse function of determining the model parameters from the data is not well defined. Degeneracy is not only a mathematical property of models, but it has also been reported in biological experiments. Classical studies on structural unidentifiability focused on the notion that one can at most identify combinations of unidentifiable model parameters. We have identified a different type of structural degeneracy/unidentifiability present in a family of models, which we refer to as the Lambda-Omega (Λ-Ω) models. These are an extension of the classical lambda-omega (λ-ω) models that have been used to model biological systems, and display a richer dynamic behavior and waveforms that range from sinusoidal to square wave to spike like. We show that the Λ-Ω models feature infinitely many parameter sets that produce identical stable oscillations, except possible for a phase shift (reflecting the initial phase). These degenerate parameters are not identifiable combinations of unidentifiable parameters as is the case in structural degeneracy. In fact, reducing the number of model parameters in the Λ-Ω models is minimal in the sense that each one controls a different aspect of the model dynamics and the dynamic complexity of the system would be reduced by reducing the number of parameters. We argue that the family of Λ-Ω models serves as a framework for the systematic investigation of degeneracy and identifiability in dynamic models and for the investigation of the interplay between structural and other forms of unidentifiability resulting on the lack of information from the experimental/observational data.
Highlights
Mathematical models are useful tools that can be used to interpret experimental or observational data, make quantitative predictions that are amenable for experimental testing, and identify the mechanisms that underlie the generation of pattern of activity in terms of the interactions among the system’s components [1,2,3]
We introduce some ideas related to unidentifiability and degeneracy in dynamical systems, including the concepts of activity attributes, level sets and parameter redundancy in models and their outputs
By design, the minimal model parameters have no physical meaning, but only dynamic meaning. They are a minimal set of model parameters in that eliminating one of them reduces the dynamic complexity
Summary
Mathematical models are useful tools that can be used to interpret experimental or observational data, make quantitative predictions that are amenable for experimental testing, and identify the mechanisms that underlie the generation of pattern of activity in terms of the interactions among the system’s components [1,2,3]. An important step in connecting models with experimental or observational data is to estimate the model parameters by fitting the model outputs to the available data (Figure 1). A large number of parameter estimation tools are available to scientists as well as methods to discover data-drive non-linear dynamic equations [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] (and references therein) and tools to link data with models continue to develop.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.