Parameter estimation for allometric trophic network models: A variational Bayesian inverse problem approach

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Abstract Differential equation models are powerful tools for predicting biological systems, capable of projecting far into the future and incorporating data recorded at arbitrary times. However, estimating these models' parameters from observations can be challenging because numerical methods are often required to approximate their solution. An example of such a model is the allometric trophic network model, for which studies considering its inverse problem are limited, particularly in the Bayesian framework. Here we develop a variational Bayesian method for parameter inference of the allometric trophic network model and explore how accurately we can recover its parameter values. We represent the model as a Bayesian neural network, which combines an artificial neural network with Bayesian inference, using a surrogate for the posterior distribution of model parameters, and train this model by evolutionary optimization to avoid potentially costly computation of the gradient with respect to the model parameters. Using synthetic data, we compare the accuracy of this variational inference to ordinary least squares estimation. To reduce the number of estimated parameters, we focus on the inference of functional response parameters. Our variational Bayesian method yields parameter estimates that are comparable to the ordinary least squares results in terms of accuracy. The method provides a promising approach for including uncertainty quantification in parameter estimation, which the simple ordinary least squares approach as it is does not address. Regardless of the method, potential multimodality of the inference problem is nonetheless important to keep in mind. The present study suggests a technique for parameter inference of ordinary differential equation models in the Bayesian context. We propose the method especially for validation of the allometric trophic network model against empirical data.