Abstract
This article explores representativeness of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) during the period from 1976 to 2007 by comparing earnings equations in the PSID and the Current Population Survey (CPS). We find that CPS-PSID differences in parameter estimates have increased and become statistically significant in the second half of the period, with the PSID considerably underestimating the returns to education. Nonrandom selection in the PSID sample, especially among those with lower levels of education, appears to be the reason.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.