Abstract

AbstractThe multi-stage hypothesis suggests that cancers develop through a single defined series of genetic alterations. This hypothesis was first suggested over 50 years ago based upon age-specific incidence data. However, recent molecular studies of tumors indicate that multiple routes exist to the formation of cancer, not a single route. This parallel route hypothesis has not been tested with age-specific incidence data.To test the parallel route hypothesis, I formulated it in terms of a mathematical equation, confirmed this equation with computer simulations, then tested whether this equation was consistent with age-specific incidence data compiled by the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registries since 1973. I used the chi-squared goodness of fit test to measure consistency.I found that the age-specific incidence data from most human carcinomas, including those of the colon, lung, prostate, and breast were consistent with the parallel route hypothesis. However, this hypothesis is only consistent if an immune sub-population exists, one that will never develop carcinoma. Furthermore, breast carcinoma has two distinct forms of the disease, and one of these occurs at significantly different rates in different racial groups.

Highlights

  • The multi-stage hypothesis [1,2] states that cancers develop through a series of genetic alterations

  • I tested the validity of the parallel routes hypothesis with the most powerful dataset available, the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results 17 registries (SEER-17) data collected in the year 2000 for the age-specific incidence of colon carcinoma

  • The parallel route hypothesis is consistent with the colon carcinoma age-specific incidence data, while the multi-stage hypothesis is not

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The multi-stage hypothesis [1,2] states that cancers develop through a series of genetic alterations. The multi-stage hypothesis was first suggested over 50 years ago based upon an analysis of the age-specific incidence data [3,4]. Anomalies exist with the age-specific incidence data that cannot be explained by the multi-stage hypothesis. Just as the multi-stage hypothesis was tested against the age-specific incidence data, so too can the parallel route hypothesis.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.