Parallel evaluation of nucleophilic and electrophilic chemical probes for sulfenic acid: Reactivity, selectivity and biocompatibility

Abstract

Cysteine sulfenic acids (Cys-SOH) are pivotal modifications in thiol-based redox signaling and central intermediates en route to disulfide and sulfinic acid states. A core mission in our lab is to develop bioorthogonal chemical tools with the potential to answer mechanistic questions involving cysteine oxidation. Our group, among others, has contributed to the development of nucleophilic chemical probes for detecting sulfenic acids in living cells. Recently, another class of Cys-SOH probes based on strained alkene and alkyne electrophiles has emerged. However, the use of different models of sulfenic acid and methodologies, has confounded clear comparison of these probes with respect to chemical reactivity, kinetics, and selectivity. Here, we perform a parallel evaluation of nucleophilic and electrophilic chemical probes for Cys-SOH. Among the key findings, we demonstrate that a probe for Cys-SOH based on the norbornene scaffold does not react with any of the validated sulfenic acid models in this study. Furthermore, we show that purported cross-reactivity of dimedone-like probes with electrophiles, like aldehydes and cyclic sulfenamides, is a not meaningful in a biological setting. In summary, nucleophilic probes remain the most viable tools for bioorthogonal detection of Cys-SOH.