Abstract

Connecting three-phase rectifier systems in parallel shows many advantages as compared to a single rectifier system with higher output power, such as higher reliability, smaller current and voltage ripple components, lower filtering effort, or higher system bandwidth. However, current unbalance or circulating currents can occur for modular design. In this paper, the parallel connection of two three-phase three-switch buck-type unity-power-factor pulsewidth-modulation rectifier systems is experimentally investigated for a 10-kW digital-signal-processor-controlled prototype. A space vector modulation scheme is employed showing all the advantages of an interleaved operation. Three control schemes for active dc-link current balancing are described employing an additional free-wheeling state that allows to influence the rate of change of the dc-link currents and can therefore be used for dc-link current balancing. The control schemes differ concerning control action and additional switching losses. Simulation and experimental results confirm the theoretical considerations: The dc-link current-balancing capability of the different control methods is compared, and the influence of the additional free-wheeling state on switching losses and operation behavior is investigated. The most advantageous control method, which employs a hysteresis controller and shows limited switching losses, is selected. The analysis of the mains behavior shows an improvement as compared to a single rectifier operation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call