Abstract
The clinical outcome literature on the efficacy of paradoxical interventions in psychotherapy over the last 7 years is critically reviewed. Following a brief examination of previous literature reviews, the existing studies are examined under one of three general headings: paradoxical intention studies, symptom prescription studies, and reframing studies. The review concludes with a general evaluation of the current standing of paradoxical interventions and a call for an increase in the quality and quantity of experimental outcome studies involving paradoxical techniques.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
