Paradigm of religious dialogue, Mediterranean period of interfaith studies

Abstract

Paper is a kind of historical sociology of religions for philosophical understanding of Al- Muhyiddin Arabi's research as a lasting paradigm in dialogue of religions. Mediterranean is place where greatest number of God's prophets were sent, and voice of prophecy of many prophets from Adam to Khatam can still be heard in that space. AL-Muhyiddin Arabi (1240), who started classical studies of religions, originated from Western Mediterranean and presented his works in eastern Mediterranean. His research has come as a paradigm that governs understanding of religions in their common subject, nature of prophets. Discussion of religions dialogue, in modern era, it is basically a question of oriental studies. Which Orientalism put it in two paradigms of Crusades and global unity of religions? Hypothesis of research is that dialogue between religions is an anthropological debate and is close to natural requirements of man. And good orientalist views are close to it. Discussion in paradigm of religions has a pattern of combination of philosophy and sociology, its origin is beyond science of religions. Dialogue of religions has a philosophical ontology in field of human existence and is a logical paradigm. There is a linear and circle approach to human history and in every attitude to history, religious dialogue, has a physical existence. Field of this philosophical opinion is anthropological process in history of sociology. In process of anthropology, there are at beginning of creation homogeneous group of people, without grounds of separation, and societies were homogeneous, and uniformity was their only characteristic, but societies also have secondary characteristics, which is essential necessity of change. And prophets who organize changes. Therefore, dialogue between religions has an existential place in societies, like reason for their existence, and it is a part of anthropology, and it has been investigated in combined science of philosophy and sociology in this research, and it shows that constant existence of dialogue between religions always has its own suitable contexts and has its own suitable contexts and discussion of religious dialogue in context of political issues is belonging complications of opposites orientalism circles, and in positive orientalism, attention is paid to ontological aspect of relationship between religions, and discussion of religions in this orientalism is closer to principle of ontology of religions, because religions are naturally for order. And the multiplicity of societies have arisen and their existence is rooted in people whose existential roots are of a uniform nature, and multitude of societies goes back to unity between people that existed in beginning because unit of society is Human(Nas). But according to historical Arrangement, in any way there are many societies.