Abstract
This article presents a family of paraconsistent inference relations which aim at reasoning with inconsistent knowledge bases. These inference relations are defined from inconsistency measures. We check under which conditions these inference relations satisfy a series of properties for nonmonotonic reasoning. We also show that they are paraconsistent when the corresponding inconsistency measures satisfy some rationality postulates, and even strictly paraconsistent in most cases. In addition, some dependencies and incompatibilities among some rationality postulates are shown.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.